LinkedIn post inspired by author Jennifer Bilek on mapping the money behind the ( bleep! ) ideology. Truth is being censored and accounts deactivated if we
dare to speak of this subject.

Note: This screenshot is an unedited version before I posted it. Their are errors and misspellings.

“Gender” is an obfuscation. It is the deconstruction of our humanity in its sexed roots that is at issue.” – Jennifer Belik

Notice of censored post by LinkedIn on July 11, 2021



Thanks to Betty L for the find via this article:


“Transgenderism: A New Medical and Lifestyle Market

It seems obvious now to look at the money behind transgenderism. Many new markets have opened because of it. The first gender clinic for children opened in Boston in 2007. In the past ten years, more than 30 clinics for children with purported gender dysphoria have arisen in the United States alone, the largest serving 725 patients.

Over the past decade, there has been an explosion in transgender medical infrastructure across the United States and world to “treat” transgender people. In addition to gender clinics proliferating across the United States, hospital wings are being built for specialized surgeries, and many medical institutions are clamoring to get on board with the new developments.

These men and others, including pharmaceutical companies and the U.S. government, are sending millions of dollars to LGBT causes. Overall reported global spending on LGBT is now estimated at $424 million. From 2003-2013, reported funding for transgender issues increased more than eightfold, growing at threefold the increase of LGBTQ funding overall, which quadrupled from 2003 to 2012. This huge spike in funding happened at the same time transgenderism began gaining traction in American culture.

$424 million is a lot of money. Is it enough to change laws, uproot language and force new speech on the public, to censor, to create an atmosphere of threat for those who do not comply with gender identity ideology?”

Who Works to Institutionalize Transgender Ideology?

This can hardly be a coincidence when the very thing absolutely essential to those transitioning are pharmaceuticals and technology.

This article will use the Pritzker family as a case study, both to reduce length and because they are emblematic of how this works. Those funding trans organizations and normalizing transgenderism are channeling funds in the same ways and invested in the same medical infrastructure. This can hardly be a coincidence when the very thing absolutely essential to those transitioning are pharmaceuticals and technology. It is also important to note that though the trans lobby has sewn itself to the LGB umbrella, LGB people as such are not lifelong medical patients.

The Pritzkers are an American family of philanthropic billionaires worth approximately $29 billion, whose fortune was gestated by Hyatt Hotels and nursing homes. They now have massive investments in the medical industrial complex.

About this blog:

“I write at the intersection of humanity, technology and runaway capitalism. At this intersection stands transgenderism, what I believe is a glamorous ad campaign generated by elites, invested in tech and pharma, to normalize the changing of human biology. I believe this because I have researched the money behind the rapidly growing juggernaut of transgenderism in American culture and beyond, and it all leads back to the pharmaceutical and tech giants that now interface with LGBT NGOs which are driving the normalization of a biology-denying ideology. This ideology has taken the bullet train of post modernism to the juncture we are at now. The LGB civil rights movement has been subsumed by elites who have added the T to normalize the overriding of our sexed reality as humans, staging a political coup of mammoth proportion.

“Gender” is an obfuscation. It is the deconstruction of our humanity in its sexed roots that is at issue.” – Jennifer Belik


Roz: I know those names because of my connections with women fighting female erasure+p o r n+etc., but I must say I’ll be shocked if this post stays up long on this platform (or your profile for that matter – there are podcasts where certain people pushing this openly discuss killing women who oppose the narrative so nixing a profile is nothing for them). For the above reason I’ll also quickly point folks to The Deprogrammer XX, who also has many informational videos. Anyone can DM me for other resources, Jennifer Bilek is a great place to start. It’s most, most definitely a highly funded, highly organized effort to ‘trans’ and confuse as many people in the population as possible – the other arm of transhumanism. This is also highly integrated with grooming children and making so-called MAPS (read: p e d o p h i l e s) socially acceptable.

Minor-attracted person (MAP) is an umbrella term for people with any condition that means they are sexually attracted to minors.

Author: I am just now learning of this.

Am I correct in saying the “sissy p o r n” had a hypnotic / addictive element built in to program an addict to hate women? These wealthy persons really hate life and women as givers of life.

Roz: Saving the fact of who actually owns and ‘regulates’ p o r n sites these days for another discussion, sissy hypno p o r n in particular uses aggressive hypnotic flashes of light and colors and words to program the viewer while stimulating them (or rather overstimulating them by flooding mirror neurons). The result is [primarily] men getting off to and therefore chemically ‘falling in love with’ the messages and images programmed into them. Flashing words include terms not suitable for here but they are degrading and treat the presumed male viewer as a female or wannabe female, and often include shame and – I say this as a clinician – what is easily considered verbal abuse. Images are of men in women’s clothing or being dominated by another man but acting as a woman (whatever THAT means…). This is systematic ‘sissification’ – men getting off to being shamed for being men, and getting off to being shamed for not being womanly enough (e.g. being punished either way but liking it).

The result is men divorcing their wives, who are asked to legally say they are lesbians in court when in fact their husband is being programmed via his p o r n addiction and then blaming his wife for not affirming him, and a host of other societal implications I won’t get into here. It’s not just this specific ‘category’ of p o r n because really all p o r n does this (long, long story again not suitable for here) but this one is definitely on the worse side, in my opinion.

I have dealt with the effects of sissifying p o r n firsthand in a previous relationship, hence my connection to these resources.

Welcome to a super effed up rabbit hole, Christine Michelle Chadwick. This is everywhere once you know what to look for. Everywhere.

And, for the record, the LGB community has been co-opted. I am not here for anti-gay comments or sentiments.

Being that I have a lifetime of spiritual studies under my belt, there are relations between the ‘T’ and certain occult beliefs that again pervade society without society knowing. I’ll leave it at that. This is territory to really be careful on, dear sister. 🙏


Just when I thought it couldn’t get any worse. SMH

Catherine Austin Fitts mentioned something about the gender/blender and transhumanist agenda is about equal rights with robots. In other words, to take away humanities’ legal rights, and give robots legal protections sort of like leveling out both in preparation for the Impact Economy that runs on Blockchain, massive data extraction and surveillance.

Just wow! This agenda is being pushed by all the big corporations, the ones that supply most of the things we need. Shame on them. We can see them in full operation now – sickening.

The governments and police departments push this crazy public relations campaign. I wrote to Sir Rob Wainwright once and asked him about the rainbow logo for Deloitte. I told him I have many friends who are gay but many more broke, poor, hurting and suffering ones and why do they not ever get a public relations campaign.


Christine Michelle Chadwick

Christine Michelle Chadwick How sex robots^ aren’t considered hate speech against women (disembodied heads, breasts, vaginas, etc. hanging in a warehouse waiting to be assembled for an individual’s sexual gratification – AND being used to mimic ’emotional’ attachments with their owners by using AI to learn their owner’s preferences and obey without resistance or even saying no every once in a while) is beyond me. There are some disturbing ‘documentaries’ and ‘interviews’ with these high-tech sex slave, I mean robot makers that are… yeah.

It’s rough. Especially when you see how it’s all connected.

If you dig deeper and need emotional support, I’m here.

And that’s nothing to say of children’s welfare organizations being involved… (End)

Jennifer Bilek on Twitter:

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s